Writing Automated Integration Tests by the Numbers

In this Throwback Tuesday post is a revamped draft post from January 2014 where I wrote about writing SpecFlow tests. Here I am generalizing the processes because I don’t use SpecFlow anymore.

One thing I learned in the Marine Corps was to do things by the numbers. It was a natural fit for my analytical mind. Plus, let’s face it, we were told we were useless maggots as dumb as a rock, and this training method was apparently the easiest way to teach a bunch of recruits. Naturally, it worked great for a dumb rock like me, OORAH!

Because of this lesson, I’ve always tried to distill common processes into neat little numbered lists. They’re easy to refer to, teach from, and optimize. When I find a pattern that works across a wide range of scenarios, I know I’ve hit on something useful. So, with that in mind, here’s how I approach writing automated integration tests by the numbers.

1. Understand the Test Data Needs

The first step in any integration test is figuring out the test data you need. This means asking questions like, “What inputs are required? What outputs am I validating?” You can’t test a system without meaningful data, so this step is non-negotiable.

2. Prepare the Test Data

Once you know what you need, it’s time to create or acquire that data. Maybe you generate it on the fly using a tool like Faker. Maybe you’ve got pre-existing seed scripts to load it. Whatever the method, getting the right data in place is critical to setting the stage for your tests.

3. Set Up the Environment

Integration tests usually need a controlled environment. This might involve spinning up Docker containers, running a seed script, or setting up mock services. Automating this step wherever possible is the key to saving time and avoiding headaches.

4. Run a Manual Sanity Check

Before diving into automation, I like to run the test manually. This gives me a feel for what the system is doing and helps catch any obvious issues before I start coding. If something’s off, it’s better to catch it here than waste time troubleshooting broken automation.

5. Create Reusable Test Components

If the test interacts with a UI, this is where I’d create or update page objects. For APIs or other layers, I’d build out reusable components to handle the interactions. Modular components make tests easier to write, maintain, and debug.

6. Write and Organize the Tests

This is the core of the process: writing the test steps and organizing them logically. Whether you’re using SpecFlow, pytest, or any other framework, the principle is the same: break your tests into clear, reusable steps.

7. Tag and Manage Tests

In SpecFlow, I used to tag scenarios with @Incomplete while they were still under development. Modern frameworks let you tag or group tests to control when and how they run. This is handy for managing incomplete tests or running only high-priority ones in CI/CD pipelines.

8. Debug and Refine

Once the test is written, run it and fix any issues. Debugging is a given, but this is also a chance to refine your steps or improve your reusable components. The goal is to make each test rock-solid and maintainable.

Lessons Learned

Breaking things down by the numbers isn’t just about being organized—it’s about being aware of where the bottlenecks are. For me, steps 1 and 2 (understanding and preparing test data) are often the slowest. Knowing that helps me focus on building tools and processes to speed up those steps.

This approach also makes training others easier. If I need to onboard someone to integration testing:

  1. Pair with them on a computer.
  2. Pull out the “Integration Tests by the Numbers” list.
  3. Call them a worthless maggot as dumb as a rock (just kidding… mostly).
  4. Walk through the process step by step.

Relevance Today

Even though I don’t use SpecFlow anymore, this process still applies. Integration testing frameworks and tools have evolved, but the principles are timeless. Whether you’re using Playwright, Cypress, or RestAssured, these steps form the foundation of effective testing.

What’s different now is the tooling. Tools like Docker, Terraform, and CI/CD pipelines have made environment setup easier. Test data can be generated on the fly with libraries like Faker or FactoryBot. Tests can be grouped and executed conditionally with advanced tagging systems.

The key takeaway? Processes evolve, but the mindset of breaking things down by the numbers is as valuable as ever. It’s how I keep my integration tests efficient, maintainable, and scalable.

Leave a comment